CR24 Coins: 11 Strong Names in a 314-Coin Weak Tape (May 2026)

The strongest CR24 coins are highly concentrated: only 11 names are in the top tier out of 314 scored, while 204 are labeled risky, so the signal set is narrow rather than broad.

That concentration matters because the market is still in bitcoin season: only 18.0% of top-50 alts have outperformed BTC over 90 days, even though BTC itself is up 17.99% over the same window.

For market-structure interpretation, this is a selective-strength regime, not a full rotation regime: the strongest CR24 names are being tested inside a sentiment-damaged market rather than confirmed by broad altcoin leadership.

Why the strongest CR24 set is so small

The top CR24 tier contains 11 coins, or 3.5% of the 314 scored names, while the risky tier contains 204 coins, equal to 65.0% of the universe. That is a narrow leadership group by any standard, and it leaves most of the market outside the strongest bracket.

The distribution is also compressed around the middle, with a median CR24 score of 36 and a mean of 38.8. In plain terms, most names are clustering in middling territory instead of separating into a broad field of strong readings.

The full range still runs from 18 to 69, so there is dispersion, but the main message is scarcity at the top. Structurally, that points to selective leadership inside a weak tape, not a market where strength is spreading across the board.

What do the top CR24 names look like today?

The top CR24 list is led by FF and SUI at 69, followed by BILL at 66, TROLL at 65, and KITE at 64. That gives the upper tier recognizable leaders, but not a runaway winner detached from the rest.

The next cluster includes INJ, LAB, and NEAR at 62, LINK at 61, and OP and UB at 60. Historically within a ranking table, a band this tight matters because it means the strongest set is grouped closely together instead of being anchored by a single extreme outlier.

The top score is 69, only 2 points above the next-best 67-equivalent threshold implied by the ranking. In plain language, the strongest names are packed into a narrow range, and structurally that suggests a contested top tier rather than a fully established leadership hierarchy.

Are top CR24 coins actually beating BTC?

The strongest CR24 names are not broadly outperforming BTC across the 7-day and 30-day windows, even though some individual coins are posting sharp short-term moves. That gap between standout winners and broad confirmation is central to the current read.

In the 7-day mover table, STABLE is the best weekly performer at +28.91%, while ICP is the worst at -19.6%. That spread is wide enough to show that the same market tape is producing both strong bursts and steep setbacks.

Over 30 days, VVV is the best mover at +70.9% and TRUMP is the weakest at -21.9%, while the median 30-day move is only +2.27%. In plain terms, gains are highly uneven rather than universal, and structurally that means isolated momentum pockets are not yet translating into broad BTC-relative leadership.

How close are the strongest names to their highs?

The top-20 drawdown table shows a median drawdown of -2.24% from the 90-day high. That places the median large-cap coin in this set close to its recent peak, which is firmer than a weak-breadth backdrop alone might imply.

BTC is only -1.47% from its 90-day high of 82,520, while BNB is -0.2% from 680.14 and USDC is effectively flat at -0.03%. Those readings show that the upper end of the market remains near local highs even as breadth stays limited.

The deepest drawdown in the table is BCH at -23.47%, so the set still includes meaningful laggards. In plain language, proximity to highs is common but not universal, and structurally that supports a benchmark-led market where resilience is concentrated near the top of the capitalization stack.

Do whale flows and derivatives confirm the strength?

BTC chain whale activity is large enough to matter, with 18,650 transfers above $1M moving $173.1B over 7 days and an average transfer size of $9.28M. That is substantial capital flow, and it keeps BTC at the center of the market’s high-value activity.

In derivatives, the top-10 perpetuals show 5 contracts with positive funding and 4 with negative funding, while the mean funding rate is 0.0022%. That historical comparison point inside the current tape matters because it signals mixed positioning instead of a one-direction leverage build.

BTC also carries the largest open interest at $8.98B, compared with ETH at $4.78B and a much smaller footprint across the rest of the ranking. In plain terms, leverage remains concentrated in the benchmark, and structurally that confirms a market where conviction is present but not broadly one-sided.

Which CR24 names are improving and which are fading?

The 7-day label-change table is dominated by deterioration, with 15 coins changing materially and the biggest loser being DYDX, down 41 points from 74 to 33. That is a sharp drop in a short window, and it signals that high scores have been fragile.

TON also fell 37 points from 61 to 24, while SIREN dropped 34 points from 62 to 28 and DASH declined 34 points from 66 to 32. The historical reference inside this same table is clear: the biggest moves are skewed toward weakening, not strengthening.

The only clear climber is FF, which rose 27 points from 42 to 69. In plain language, improvement exists but remains the exception, and structurally that keeps the market in a regime where new leadership is emerging more slowly than prior leadership is fading.

Why this is still a bitcoin-season market

The altcoin season index is only 18.0%, meaning just 18.0% of top-50 alts have outperformed BTC over the last 90 days. That is a low breadth reading for alt leadership and sets the frame for the rest of the CR24 table.

BTC itself is up 17.99% over the same 90-day window. In comparative terms, the benchmark is still carrying the market even while select names produce strong CR24 scores.

This remains a bitcoin_season regime, not an altcoin season regime. In plain language, strong individual coins can still appear, but structurally they are operating inside a market led by BTC rather than confirmed by broad altcoin rotation.

What to watch in the next update

The key threshold is whether the top CR24 tier expands beyond 11 names. If that count widens, the signal is broadening; if it does not, concentration remains the defining feature.

The label-change table also matters because the last 7 days produced 15 material transitions, with deterioration dominating the list. In plain terms, the durability of current leaders depends on whether fallers keep outnumbering climbers.

BTC’s position near its 90-day high, with the same -1.47% drawdown noted above, also needs to be read alongside the altcoin season index near 18.0%. Structurally, if those conditions persist together, the market stays benchmark-led even if individual CR24 names continue to post isolated strength.

Bottom line

The main takeaway is that CR24 strength is real but narrow: the strongest names exist inside a market that is still overwhelmingly risk-heavy, BTC-led, and only selectively confirmed by price.

The next update should be read as a test of breadth, not a test of headline performance. If the strongest names multiply while label deterioration slows, the signal is strengthening; if not, the market is still producing isolated pockets of strength.

What would change this view

Falsifiers

• If the top CR24 tier expands materially above 11 names while risky labels fall well below 204, the concentration thesis is wrong.
• If the altcoin season index moves well above 18.0% and BTC dominance-style leadership weakens in the same window, the BTC-led framing is invalid.
• If label changes flip from mostly fallers to mostly climbers and FF-like improvements become common instead of rare, the deterioration thesis is wrong.

What to watch next

Watch next

• Top CR24 count versus 11
• Label-change balance: fallers vs climbers
• Altcoin season index versus 18.0%

Frequently asked questions

Is CR24 coins strength concentrated or broad today?

CR24 coins strength is concentrated: only 11 names are in the top tier out of 314 scored, while 204 names sit in the risky bucket. The median CR24 score is 36 and the mean is 38.8, so the distribution is still clustered around middling readings rather than broadly strong ones. That points to selective leadership, not a market-wide confirmation.

What do CR24 coins signal in this market?

CR24 coins signal selective strength inside a damaged tape. The top tier includes FF and SUI at 69, but the broader market still has 65.0% of scored names in risky and only 18.0% of top-50 alts outperforming BTC over 90 days. That means strong names exist, but they are not yet backed by broad rotation.

How is the CR24 coins ranking interpreted?

The CR24 coins ranking is read as a score distribution, not a price forecast. Today the top score is 69, the median is 36, and the universe spans from 18 to 69 across 314 scored coins. When the top tier stays small and the middle stays crowded, the structure is selective rather than expansive.

When does the CR24 coins regime change?

A CR24 coins regime change would show up when the top tier expands materially beyond 11 names and the label-change table stops showing mostly deterioration. If the 15 recent transitions keep producing fallers like DYDX at -41 points and TON at -37, the current weak-breadth regime persists. A broader improvement would mark a structural shift.

Is BTC still leading the CR24 coins market?

Yes. BTC is up 17.99% over 90 days, while only 18.0% of top-50 alts have outperformed it, which keeps the market in bitcoin season. Even with strong CR24 coins like FF, SUI, and LINK on the board, the benchmark still sets the tone. That is a BTC-led structure, not an altcoin-season one.